The integration of artificial intelligence in software testing isn’t just changing the workflow for testers, it’s reshaping how developers approach testing throughout the development life cycle. While much of the discussion around AI focuses on code generation, an equally powerful force is emerging in testing workflows, where AI is solving real bottlenecks that have plagued development teams for years.
That said, the reality is a bit messier than what you’ve likely read. Today’s tools work best when you treat them as starting points, rather than complete solutions. They may generate test cases that miss critical edge cases, struggle with complex code bases, and ignore existing patterns in your system. At this time, they demand careful human oversight to catch mistakes.
What does this look like in practice? Here are seven ways these tools are changing day-to-day testing workflows, along with the reality of what’s working, what isn’t, and where you’re likely to see the biggest impact on your own development process.
Test case generation from code changes
One of the most immediate applications of AI in testing is the generation of automated test cases. Tools can now analyze commit messages alongside the actual code changes to derive comprehensive test cases. Instead of writing “test the login functionality” after implementing OAuth integration, automated analysis of your code diff can generate specific scenarios: testing with valid tokens, expired tokens, malformed requests, and other edge cases you might not have considered.
This eliminates the friction between implementing a feature and defining how to test it. Previously, developers either wrote their own test cases — adding to their workload — or handed off incomplete testing specifications to QA teams. Now the test cases emerge directly from the implementation, maintaining consistency between what was built and what gets tested.
For many teams, this is also the best place to start. Feeding your existing code base to an AI model can quickly surface essential workflows and problematic input scenarios, even if not every suggestion is perfect. The key is to treat AI as a collaborative partner: review its output, refine the requests, and build iteratively on its suggestions rather than expecting complete solutions up front.
Visual testing through screenshots
Perhaps more significantly, new visual analysis capabilities in large language models (LLMs) are opening entirely new testing approaches. You can now take screenshots of your running application and use them for automated assessment. This means programmatic evaluation of UI layouts, color consistency, button placement, and interaction patterns — tasks that previously required manual review.
For full-stack developers, this represents a major shift. Back-end developers who occasionally touch front-end code now can get meaningful feedback on UI implementation without relying on design reviews. AI can flag when buttons are misaligned, when color schemes are inconsistent, or when the layout doesn’t match expected patterns, all at the speed of automated testing rather than human review cycles.
Eliminating manual test script writing
For teams that require developers to write Selenium, Cypress, or Playwright automation scripts alongside their features, AI is removing this secondary coding burden entirely. Instead of maintaining two code bases — your actual feature and the automation code to test it — you can describe the test scenario and let AI handle the automation implementation.
This is particularly valuable for developers who find themselves responsible for both feature development and test automation. Rather than context-switching between product code and test scripts, you can focus on the core implementation while AI handles the mechanical work of translating test cases into executable automation. Of course, developers need to validate the correctness of these generated test scripts, but there is a huge time savings from not authoring the implementation.
Accelerating the planning/thinking phase
In addition to accelerating the code-writing process, AI is helping to compress the thinking phase that precedes coding. Previously, developers might spend an hour analyzing a feature request, understanding component relationships, and planning the implementation before writing any code. AI can shorten this planning phase dramatically.
For complex changes, like adding event-based triggers to an existing time-based scheduling system, you can feed your entire code base context to an AI model and get assistance with impact analysis. The AI can identify which files need changes, suggest where new fields should be added, and flag potential conflicts with existing functionality. In some cases, what once took an hour of analysis can now be reduced to 10 minutes.
However, this capability does require breaking problems into manageable chunks. AI still struggles with deduplication and holistic system understanding, so the most effective approach involves iterative refinement: first getting help with the overall plan, then diving into specific implementation details, rather than asking for a complete solution up front. That “hour-to-10-minute” acceleration is something only maybe the top 1% of dev teams are achieving today. For most developers, the gains are still more modest.
Over time, however, more developers and teams will improve their ability to use AI during the thinking and planning phases.
Improved developer communication
AI’s content generation capabilities are reshaping how developers communicate about their work. Pull request descriptions, code review comments, and release notes can be generated automatically by analyzing code changes and commit messages.
This addresses a common developer pain point: translating technical implementations into clear explanations for different audiences. AI can take the same code change and generate a technical summary for engineering review, a feature description for product management, and user-facing release notes, each tailored to the appropriate audience.
For developers who struggle with communication or documentation, this opens up new opportunities to grow their skills. You can produce professional, comprehensive descriptions of your work without spending substantial time on writing and formatting.
Testing as a feedback mechanism
Beyond verification, testing serves as a critical feedback loop during development. When you test your changes locally, you often discover not just bugs but opportunities for improvement — edge cases you hadn’t considered, user experience issues, or integration points that need refinement.
AI can accelerate this feedback cycle by automatically running through test scenarios and providing qualitative assessments. Rather than manually clicking through workflows, you can get AI-generated insights about potential issues, suggested test cases you haven’t covered, and questions about your implementation approach.
Data transformation for testing
AI also excels at converting unstructured or semi-structured data into usable test inputs. If you capture API calls during a web session, AI can transform that pseudo-structured data into clean JSON for your test harness. Similarly, scraped web content can be converted into structured test data, and existing test data sets can be modified programmatically, turning positive numbers negative, generating variations on existing scenarios, or expanding test coverage without manual data manipulation.
The operational takeaway
AI is reshaping software testing in distinct ways — from generating test cases and transforming test data to accelerating planning and improving communication. Together, these shifts reduce friction across the development life cycle, allowing teams to move faster without compromising quality.
Of course, the technology isn’t without constraints. AI models can struggle with large, complex requests and often create new solutions rather than reusing existing code. The most effective approach involves breaking large problems into smaller, focused tasks and maintaining human oversight throughout the process.
The most significant change isn’t technological — it’s operational. By embracing these technologies thoughtfully, teams can streamline testing workflows while developers expand their role beyond coding into strategy, quality assessment, and cross-functional communication. Those are the skills that will matter most as AI takes on more of the repetitive mechanics of testing and coding.
—
New Tech Forum provides a venue for technology leaders—including vendors and other outside contributors—to explore and discuss emerging enterprise technology in unprecedented depth and breadth. The selection is subjective, based on our pick of the technologies we believe to be important and of greatest interest to InfoWorld readers. InfoWorld does not accept marketing collateral for publication and reserves the right to edit all contributed content. Send all inquiries to doug_dineley@foundryco.com.
